POLICING THE CANUCKS

According to the Vancouver Courier (April 6, 2012) the city is prepared to spend more than $1 million on policing costs on the National Hockey League’s playoffs, depending upon whether or not the Vancouver Canucks are involved. Justifiably nervous after last year’s Stanley Cup riot, the city plans a measurable increase in police presence.

Policing for the first game, which happens on Friday, April 13th, is estimated to cost $67,472. Costs for subsequent games, including the Stanley Cup Final, are set at $86,488; $163, 744; and $752,963 respectively.  The grand total, billed to Vancouver taxpayers, comes to $1,070, 667.

VANCOUVER’S CULTURAL GRANTS

Meanwhile, the city allocated $2,852,600 in 2011 operating grants to local cultural organizations.

Policing costs: $0.00

While we applaud the City’s total allocation of $7,275,600 in all grant programs—including $3,959,400 to major organizations like the Vancouver Art Gallery ($2,181,00)—we note that grant requests totalled $8,501,779, more likely reflecting actual need.

CULTURAL TOURISM

A more substantial investment in the arts could make a real difference. We believe that cultural tourism has the potential of bringing vast social and economic benefits to Vancouver—without any increase in police costs. This would call for a change in our vision (Vision?) of what makes a city a desirable destination for travellers. Progressive cities (Frankfurt, Valencia, Miami Beach, Seattle, San Francisco, Oslo, e.g.) are promoting arts and culture as reasons for visiting. An ad in The New Yorker (March 26, 2012) says: Explore Oslo, Capital of Culture—Experience a unique combination of art, culture, and the great outdoors in Norway’s celebrated capital.

Enough said.

YOU MIGHT BE INTERESTED

For full details on the city’s 2011 cultural grants, see Administrative Report, 2011 Cultural Grants Allocations.

A NO-NONSENSE STATEMENT FROM THE CARIBOO

One of the main issues here in small rural BC is that we have not affordable programmes for performing arts anymore.  There used to be series that we could plug into years ago and programmes through the Arts and Culture but they are just not affordable for small communities.  The Olympics spirit festival or some damn thing was a joke up here in the Cariboo.

Of course, the schools are still in need of arts coordination and support.  The current testing programme leaves the arts out entirely so what we test and value is having and effect, mostly negative.  We are graduating kids that do not have the faintest background in artistic literacy and that will catch up to us eventually.

Then to have schools rated by the likes of the Fraser Institute and then published in the press, according to Dr. Paul Shaker is an outgrowth of the push behind the scenes to totally privatize education, and do away with public education.  The Private Schools are listed in the top 10 as the best schools when in fact they are sorted by a population who has money and we know that the rich tend to have children who do better anyway.

This is the society that we are evolving to, a quasi meritocracy only based on money.  First Nations,  handicapped and special needs students do not rate.  I have trouble with this kind of meritocracy.

Answer to this? Keep trumpeting what the Coalition for Music Education in Canada and others (AABC) are advocating.  Something else:  de-politicize education from the degree it has become in Canada to the degree that makes it stand out negatively in Canada.  The Provinces in my estimation to look to now are Manitoba and Newfoundland , who still have some valuing of the arts and do not pull off the Ida Chung kind of bafflegab.  Thanks for drawing my attention to the meeting when Herhert Spencer roasts her quietly and effectively.  What utter nonsense!

We need an arts and cuture initiative such as the Newfoundland Labrador Government has in education and community arts.

Start lobbying the NDP who if I am not mistaken will have the next majority.  Spencer is great.  He is on side.

There is more to my rant but I will have a drink, calm down and go about my business of humbly trying to bring people in our little area along with other humble and dedicated folks to the arts and culture here.

Dennis Tupman (Green Lake, BC Cariboo)

Maybe the blame lies on us. The follow article was sent to us by AABC board member Connie More.
We invite your thoughts.

Entire performing arts industry is to blame for the demise of the Vancouver Playhouse

March 17, 2012 00:03:00
Matthew Jocelyn

The Vancouver Playhouse announced on March 9 that, crippled by chronic deficit-related issues, it was closing its doors the very next day, a few months shy of its 50th anniversary. This was and is a day of mourning for Canadian theatre.

More significantly, it is a sign of the collective failure of all of us directly or indirectly involved in the performing arts industry in Canada, a failure to defend the indisputable need for strong, publicly funded theatrical institutions in our country.

Created in 1962, the Vancouver Playhouse Theatre Company was a forerunner of the boom of large regional theatre companies established countrywide throughout the 1960s, supported largely, at their inception, by the Canada Council for the Arts . Yet despite this generous support to create a network of centres for the performing arts, the intrinsic, lasting value of being an institution was never truly conferred upon them.

As with many such organizations, the Vancouver Playhouse remained a “company,” a rootless entity forced to rent its city-owned performance space and justify its existence through commercial success. The term “company,” though used widely in the theatre business, unwittingly and perversely infers a likeness to the private sector. Companies come and go, are bought and sold and in the end must turn a profit or die. Institutions, on the other hand, are part of the fabric of society, they give meaning while at the same time being engines for change, and for that reason are essential to preserve.

Which public school, which hospital, museum or university, which prison or military base, research centre or art gallery goes by the term “company” or is treated as one? Why then our country’s not-for-profit performing arts institutions, a fundamental part of our national identity, the home for the creation and transmission of our stories?

The bankruptcy of the Vancouver Playhouse is not a local problem — it is the failure of an entire system. It is a failure of the department of Canadian Heritage which, by allowing this disappearance, is depriving not only Vancouver but also the rest of Canada of a fundamental part of our national heritage. It is a failure of the Canada Council for the Arts, whose funding mechanisms are not attuned to the specific role of the country’s major performing arts institutions, forcing us to operate on an edulcorated commercial model as opposed to enabling us to fulfill the mandate of true creative licence and engaged public service that should be ours.

It is a failure of the province of British Columbia and the city of Vancouver. And it is a failure of the Playhouse’s board of directors, unwilling or unable to fulfill their charge as its guardians, or to actively rally support for its preservation.

It is also a failure of the performing arts institutional network of which I am a part, the large-scale not-for-profit theatres, each caught up in our own survival to such a degree that we have been unable to create a collective national voice. It is a failure of the Professional Association of Canadian Theatres (PACT), an organization representing all professional theatre in the country, yet incapable of defending a major institution at a critical moment for fear of internal criticism from a membership dominated by smaller independent companies, most of whom also struggle to survive.

It is a failure of the two principal unions in the performing arts sector: Actors’ Equity and IATSE. Both were created as defensive mechanisms against American touring productions long before not-for-profit theatre came into existence in Canada, and both continue to confuse purely commercial theatre with theatre that has a mandate for public service, exacting often crippling conditions for our productions.

It is a failure of the media because, in general, the media are uninterested in the arts, and of theatre critics in particular, too many of whom assume that venting their (often alarmingly ill-informed) opinion is more important than “mediating” the work they are writing about, that is, helping audiences understand and appreciate its nature, its successes and failings, thus helping foster the curiosity and appetite without which theatre dies.

Sadly, it is also a failure of the artists — and here again I include myself — unable to produce a body of work that makes theatre a truly necessary, truly integrated part of our modern world, and of the audiences, insufficient in number, insufficiently curious, excessively influenced by the above-mentioned critical inadequacies.

It is, in other words, the failure of an entire system. And in this failure, each of us has lost, no one gained.

As with all true tragedies however, some form of catharsis can ensue. The disappearance of the Vancouver Playhouse can and must serve a purpose, must help us attain a deeper understanding of our profession, of the work we are (or aren’t) doing, the role we play (or don’t) within today’s world. This collective failure must be seized as an opportunity to undertake an uncompromisingly critical evaluation of how not-for-profit theatre has evolved in Canada over the past 50 years, of what we are doing (or aren’t) to ensure an artistically vital, socially integrated, institutionally rooted industry for the 50 years to come.

Simply put, it is time for an audit, a detailed medical examination of our collective corps malade . And in the wake, it is time to pursue whatever measures are required, be they surgical or otherwise. Without such fearless self-analysis, our entire industry is potentially prey to the same fatal disease as that which got the better of the Vancouver Playhouse.

As the curtain closes on the Vancouver Playhouse, I can’t help myself from asking: Who’s next?

A more insidious question follows, one for which we are all responsible: Who really cares?

Matthew Jocelyn is artistic and general director of Canadian Stage .

Home | Contact © Copyright Toronto Star 1996-2012

We have received the following e-mail from NDP Arts and Culture Critic about an exchange with the Honorable Ida Chong, Minister of Community, Sport, and Cultural Development, regarding a$3 million “residue” in her ministry and how it is to be allocated.

Dear Friends of BC’s Creative Sector,

I wanted to share with you questions that I raised with Arts Minister Ida Chong during yesterday’s sitting of the house. I raised questions about support for the film and television industry, BC Arts Council and dedicated arts funding from the provincial budget. Scroll down to read more or you can watch our exchange online here

http://spencerherbertmla.us1.list-manage1.com/track/click?u=11073062ad037597beccee62e&id=7469ea8d87&e=93f455310b

[While we do recommend watching, or at least listening to, this video, we expect you will find the exchange somewhat mindnumbing, though ultimately interesting, especially when it gets around to the $3 million.--AABC]

I was surprised to learn that Minister Chong has been sitting on approximately $3 million dollars in unallocated arts and culture funding that has yet to dispersed. I questioned the Minister and it was revealed that her Ministry has only 30 days to spend these funds and furthermore that there is no official application process in place for arts groups to access these funds. Here is one of the questions that I raised:

S. Chandra Herbert: I think that people in the arts and culture industry will be interested, and surprised to a large extent, that the minister herself has approximately $3 million to allocate as she sees fit. Certainly, I am surprised. I think the minister has spoken about applications. Well, was there an open call? Is it just whoever knows? How does this happen?

Once she has allocated the dollars, will she be releasing what the applications consisted of, so that people can see that it was done in a fair and transparent manner? Will she release what advice she had, so that she can be sure that it was broad-based and regionally supported, so that people see that she is using taxpayers’ dollars in a wise manner? As the minister will know, the B.C. Arts Council operates through a pure jury process — in a sense, to try and take away the concern that people might play favourites, that political considerations might come into how funds are allocated.

For this upcoming year will the minister be making any open call to the public to say that she has $3 million to spend for arts and culture groups?

I am extremely concerned that this $3 million dollars could be used as a political slush fund by a party that is not faring well in public opinion polls, and could use these funds to shore up support.

I am writing to share this information with you and also to encourage you to contact Minister Chong.

What do you think about her decision to not distribute $3 million in arts funding at a time in which arts are companies are struggling following the deepest cuts to arts and culture in BC? What do you think about the fact that her Ministry has control over $3 million in funds, with no accountability from the community about how it would best be spent?

I encourage you to write Minister Chong – [email protected] or contact her via Twitter twitter.com/#!/Ida_Chong >   and let her know your thoughts.

Sincerely,

Spencer Chandra Herbert, MLA
Vancouver-West End
Official Opposition Critic for Arts and Culture

For the full letter:

http://gallery.mailchimp.com/11073062ad037597beccee62e/images/Letter_footer.jpg

From Colin Miles

Friends,
I think the arts and culture and non-profit sector  in BC has been under siege and is so relieved to have some resolution of the gaming revenues issue that it has lost its sense of outrage.

Although the Triplett Report has much value, I was disappointed he rejected the option of allotting a percentage of gaming  revenues to charities.  A frozen reduced and capped amount is little to celebrate.

We are underwhelmed and being too polite about the government response, I think

I hope others will respond to Pete McMartin’s insightful column

The non-profit sector and all it accomplishes is too important to  be demeaned this way.  We can be respectful of public servants but this is a matter of justice and we need to tell them their solution is just not good enough.  My two cent’s worth.

I am pleased the SUN printed my letter but they changed my words from “billions” to  “millions”.

If someone wants to take it from here we might coin the term the “two billion dollar theft.”

Here are two pertinent comments on Christy Clark’s Gaming Policy Review.

Read Pete McMartin’s column: Government slight of hand does not fool charities.

Following is the response from the Alliance for Arts and Culture:

Alliance Responds To Gaming Grant Announcements

Premier Christy Clark today released Scott Triplett’s Community Gaming Grant Review report and announced some good news for the arts community.

”We are very encouraged by Premier Clark’s announcement of increases to funding and eligibility for BC Gaming Grants,” saidAlliancefor Arts and Culture executive director Rob Gloor in responding to today’s announcement.

“The premier has described the $135 Million grant budget as the ‘new base’, and added that stabilizing arts funding has been a priority for her government and a personal commitment since taking office as premier.  There is no doubt that today’s announcement will have a very positive impact in communities across BC through the work of hundreds of organizations.

“TheAlliancefor Arts and Culture is eager to review the fine details of the funding and associated allocations process in the context of Mr. Triplett’s report. The arts community has endured tremendous funding challenges over the past three years, and we are grateful to receive some news of positive steps,” Mr. Gloor concluded.

ANNOUNCEMENT HIGHLIGHTS

  • The Province has increased gaming grants in its annual base budget to a total of $135 million, beginning this fiscal year.
  • That will mean $15 million more in gaming grants than originally budgeted for 2011/12.
  • This funding will reach right across the province with a large part going outside of the Lower Mainland to more than 2,000 organizations in hundreds of communities.
  • Groups focusing on adult arts and sports, animal welfare and environmental concerns will be eligible for community gaming grants.
  • These reinstated groups will receive a total of $8 million. The Province will conduct a special intake of applications from Jan. 16 to Feb. 13 to ensure these groups are eligible for funding this fiscal year. Interested organizations will be required to apply online.
  • Of this $8 million, $6 million will be allocated for adult arts, culture and sport organizations, while environmental organizations will be allocated $2 million.
  • This funding will benefit non-profit organizations that deliver key community services such as animal shelter organizations, fish and wildlife associations, lake and stream stewardship societies, district arts councils, museum societies, and theatres.
  • The remaining $7 million will be used to increase funding to groups that have experienced reductions during the past three years, including those responsible for fairs, festivals, youth arts and culture, community service, the B.C. Senior Games and community education organizations.
  • Funding will benefit community-focused organizations such as Kiwanis and Lions Club, heritage and folk music societies, non-profit child development societies, youth music schools and pipe bands.
  • The Province is also exploring options for introducing multi-year funding in the coming years for groups that have achieved earned independence through sound fiscal practices.

Today’s government media release can be found here .
THE REVIEW

Between August 11th and Sept.16th, 2011 Mr. Triplett held Community Forums in 19 locations across BC. A total of 1,229 British Columbians attended these forums and 336 people made oral presentations

The full Community Gaming Grant report can be found here .

The community presentations can be found here .

- END -

Form Follows Funding

In a recent article by Clay Shirky about how newspapers are going to figure out their future in terms of revenue, I thought just how much it could apply to many non-profit arts organizations.

In many ways, especially for service organizations, they face a very similar situation. In their case, their subscribers are their members.

Here is the last paragraph from the article.

“It will take time for the economic weight of those users to affect the organizational form of the paper, but slowly slowly, form follows funding. For the moment at least, the most promising experiment in user support means forgoing mass in favor of passion; this may be the year where we see how papers figure out how to reward the people most committed to their long-term survival.”

The key phrase was “form follows funding.”

This is a complex article, but well worth it. You can read it here .

As public funding dries up I think arts organizations will need to look at what their “form” is and will be forced to sink or swim on a new model. Yes, we can scream and kick, but without public funding support the form of the organizations (the way they’ve operated) that have followed the funding are going to be shaken.

In Canada, here is what the Federal Minister of Heritage James Moore said in a Vancouver Sun article: “Moore underlined the fact organizations matching government support with significant private funding will insulate themselves best from cuts and prosper most during the Conservative era.” Full story here .

My read on this? Arts funding has always been political. The pendulum has shifted and we have in Canada a Conservative Government (and in BC a conservative government even though their name is “Liberal”) that a) doesn’t like funding arts and b) wants everything to be run like a business.

The good news is, “Culture” will not die because it’s not funded by public money. They know that. It just won’t be the culture that we who work in the culture business want to hear or see.

We will continue to make the solid arguments about why funding arts is valuable both socially and economically and we’ll adapt. Some will suffer and die, others will thrive. We are very lucky to be able to even have this discussion and debate.

-

PS – we shouldn’t overlook the fact that it is the Department of Canadian Heritage. Heritage being the main word. The current Government really likes “Heritage” whereas the arts are about moving forward. Perhaps it’s no wonder they take money from progressive programs to pay for multi-million dollar War of 1812 projects.

WHAT HAPPENED TO CHRISTY CLARK’S GAMING GRANT REVIEW?
This letter was sent to the Vancouver Courier by AABC member Colin Miles.

Arts Advocacy BC sent a short questionnaire posing this question to leadership candidates of the provincial Liberal and New Democratic Party.

“Will you honour the 1999 Memorandum of Agreement to allocate 33.3 percent of gaming revenues to non-profits, or agree to re-negotiate that agreement in good faith?
”

While NDP and Green candidates answered they would honour the memorandum, Christy Clark answered.  “These are difficult economic times and I want to make sure that we maintain our fiscal discipline. At the same time, groups who count on gaming grants 
as a source of revenue need some assurance, which is why I will ask a retired judge to chair a review of the way gaming grants are allocated to all groups in the province to ensure there is a stable and sustainable funding formula.
 The arts community will have a voice at the table during the review of gaming grants as we all work to create a funding system that works for government and the groups that count on the funding.”

Since the Campbell Government abrogated the Memorandum of Agreement, 8,000 organizations in the non-profit sector have been decimated and it is estimated 1,500 non-profit organizations have gone under.  Arts and culture have been doubly jeopardized by savage cuts in grants.

As promised, Premier Clark appointed Skip Triplett to chair a Community Gaming Grant Review.  1,700 British Columbians made submissions and the Report was delivered October 31.  It was supposed to be released to the public by year-end, but the Government has reneged on this promise.   Why the delay?  Does the report perhaps embarrass the government?

Colin Miles

FOUR PRESENTATION POINTS FOR THE GAMING GRANT REVIEW
SEE ALSO: ACTION ALERTS

AABC board member David Stewart is presenting the following four points to the Castelgar forum on Monday,  August 15th:

  1. Streamline the application and reporting process for organizations whose budgets are under $50,000 per year
  2. Re-structure eligibility to include adult engagement in Arts, Culture, and Heritage activities
  3. Use gaming grants to increase the Province’s funding to Arts, Culture, and Heritage to at least the National Average. BC has, for too long had the questionable distinction of ranking thirteenth of all the provinces and territories when it comes to arts and heritage funding.
  4. Re-introduce and strengthen options for multi-year funding to enhance the sustainability of charitable organizations.

David is president of both the  BC Choral Federation and the  North Kootenay Lake Arts & Heritage Council.

You’ll find information about the review at this government website . Be sure to follow the links to location nearest you, how to make a written submission, etc. It’s also informative to Google “BC Gaming Grant Review” and see what other people are saying about it. Is this a serious request for citizen recommendations–or just the usual Liberal window dressing?

Don’t forget to see: ACTION ALERTS

We value your comments.

Here’s a message from Jon Washburn forwarded by our friends Colin Miles and Winifred Nowell. Be sure to watch the YouTube video of this remarkable and inspiring occasion.

singers, staff and board:
Here’s something for when you have a quiet moment. There is a rough (machine) translation into English after the Spanish and then a Youtube site to click on.
I suggest you have a kleenex handy.
Even in Italy and other European countries, governments are using their self-inflicted financial crises as an excuse to gut their arts and culture infrastructures. Muti’s protest is singularly compelling -  and inspiring to those of us who tire of the unending battle against the many short-sighted enemies of the arts.
Thanks to Vivienne and David, who passed it on to me.
Jon

Italia finalmente despertó. Les dejo saborear esto. Es conmovedor.

El último 12 de marzo, Silvio Berlusconi debió enfrentar la realidad. Italia festejaba el 150 aniversario de su unificación y en esa ocasión se dio en la ópera de Roma la ópera “Nabucco” de Giuseppe Verdi, dirigida por el maestro Ricardo Muti. Nabucco es una obra tanto musical como política: evoca el episodio de  la esclavitud de los judíos en Babilonia, y su famoso coro “Va pensiero” es el canto de los esclavos oprimidos. En Italia, este canto es el símbolo de la búsqueda de libertad del pueblo, que a fines del siglo XIX -época en que se escribió la ópera – estaba oprimido por el imperio Habsburgo, al que combatió hasta la creación de la Italia unificada.

Antes de la representación, Gianni Alemanno, alcalde de Roma, subió al escenario para pronunciar un discurso denunciando los recortes al presupuesto de cultura que hizo el gobierno, a pesar de que Alemanno es miembro del partido gobernante y viejo ministro de Berlusconi. Esta intervención política, en un momento cultural de los más simbólicos para Ialia, produciría un efecto inesperado, puesto que Berlusconi en persona asistía a la representación.

Relatado luego por el Times, Ricardo Muti, director de la orquesta, contó que fue una verdadera velada de revolución: “Al principio hubo una gran ovación en el público. Luego comenzamos con la ópera. Se desarrolló muy bien hasta que llegamos al famoso canto Va pensiero. Inmediatamente sentí que la atmósfera se tensaba en el público. Hay cosas que no se pueden describir, pero uno las siente. Era el silencio del público que se hacía sentir. Pero en el momento en que la gente se dio cuenta que empezaba el Va Pensiero, el silencio se llenó de verdadero fervor. Se podía sentir la reacción visceral del público ante el lamento de los esclavos que cantan: “Oh patria mía, tan bella y perdida.”

Cuando el coro llegaba a su fin, ya se oían en el público varios “bis”.  El público comenzó a gritar: “¡Viva Italia!”, “¡Viva Verdi!”, “¡Larga vida a Italia!”. La gente en el gallinero comenzó a arrojar papeles con mensajes patrióticos. En una única ocasión Muti había aceptado hacer un bis  para el “Va Pensiero” en la Scala de Milán en 1986, puesto que para él la ópera no debe sufrir interrupciones. “Yo no quería sólo hacer un bis. Tenía que haber una intención especial para hacerlo”, relata. Pero el público ya había despertado su sentimiento patriótico. En un gesto teatral, Muti se dio vuelta y miró al público y a Berlusconi a la vez, y dijo:

“Sí, estoy de acuerdo con esto. “Larga vida a Italia”. Pero….
Ya no tengo más 30 años y he vivido mi vida, pero recorrí mucho el mundo, y hoy tengo vergüenza de lo que sucede en mi país. Entonces accedo a vuestro pedido de un bis para el Va Pensiero, nuevamente. No es sólo por la dicha patriótica que siento, sino porque esta noche, cuando dirigía el Coro que cantó “Ay mi patria, bella y perdida” , pensé que si seguimos así vamos a matar la cultura sobre la cual se construyó la historia de Italia.

En tal caso, nuestra patria estaría en verdad “bella y perdida”.

(Aplausos , incluidos de los artistas en escena)

Continuó: Ya que reina acá un clima italiano, yo, Muti, me callé la boca muchos años. Quisiera ahora… tendríamos que darle sentido a este canto; estamos en nuestra casa, el teatro de Roma, y con un coro que cantó magníficamente bien y que acompañó espléndidamente. Si quieren, les propongo unirse a nosotros para que cantemos todos juntos.

Entonces invitó al público a cantar con el  coro de esclavos. “Vi grupos de gente levantarse. Toda la ópera de Roma se levantó. Y el Coro también. Fue un momento mágico en la ópera.
Esa noche no fue solamente una representación de Nabucco, sino también una declaración del teatro de la capital para llamar la atención a los políticos.”

Acá está el video de ese momento lleno de emoción:
http://www.youtube.com/embed/G_gmtO6JnRs

Italy finally woke up. I leave you to savor this. It is moving.

Last March 12, Silvio Berlusconi had to face reality. Italy celebrated the 150th anniversary of its unification, and this time was at the opera in Rome’s opera “Nabucco” by Giuseppe Verdi, conducted by Maestro Ricardo Muti. Nabucco is a work both musically and politically: it evokes the episode from the bondage of the Jews in Babylon and its famous chorus “Va pensiero” is the song of the oppressed slaves. In Italy, this song is the symbol of the quest for freedom for people, who in the late nineteenth century period when he wrote the opera – was oppressed by the Hapsburg Empire, who fought to the creation of a unified Italy.

Before the performance, Gianni Alemanno, Rome’s mayor, took the stage to deliver a speech denouncing the culture budget cuts made by the government, although Alemanno is a member of the old ruling party and Minister Berlusconi. This political intervention in a cultural moment of the most symbolic for Ialia would produce an unexpected effect, since Berlusconi himself attended the performance.

Then reported by the Times, Ricardo Muti, conductor, said he was a true evening of revolution: “At first there was a standing ovation in the audience. Then we started with opera. It developed very well until we got to the famous song Va pensiero. I immediately felt that the atmosphere was tense in the audience. There are things you can not describe, but you feel them. It was the silence of the public who made her feel. But at the time that people realized that began Va Pensiero, the silence was filled with real fervor. You could feel the visceral reaction of the audience to the cry of the slaves sing, “Oh my country, so beautiful and lost.”

When the choir came to an end because the public could be heard several “bis”. The crowd began shouting: “Viva Italia”, “Viva Verdi”, “Long live Italy!”. People in the house began throwing papers with patriotic messages. Only once Muti had agreed to do an encore for “Va Pensiero” at La Scala in Milan in 1986, since for him the opera does not suffer interruptions. ”I did not just want an encore. Had to be a special intention for it,” he says. But the public had awakened his patriotism. In a theatrical gesture, Muti turned and looked at the audience and Berlusconi at a time, and said:

“Yes, I agree with this.” Long live Italy “. But ….
I have no more than 30 years and have lived my life, but traveled a lot over the world, and today I have shame of what is happening in my country. So I agree to your request for an encore to Va Pensiero, again. It is not just for the joy I feel patriotic, but because tonight, when he directed the choir who sang “Oh my country, beautiful and lost,” and I thought that if we’re going to kill the culture upon which they built the history of Italy .

In this case, our country would truly “beautiful and lost.”

(Applause, including the artists on stage)

He continued: As an Italian climate reigns here, I, Muti, I shut up for many years. I now … would have to make sense of this song, we are in our house, the theater of Rome, and a choir sang magnificently and beautifully accompanied. If you want, I propose to join us to sing together.

Then he invited the audience to sing the chorus of slaves. ”I saw groups of people up. All the Rome Opera House stood. And the choir as well. It was a magical moment in the opera.
That night was not just a representation of Nabucco, but also a statement of the theater in the capital to call attention to the politicians. ”

Here’s the video of that moment full of emotion

http://www.youtube.com/embed/G_gmtO6JnRs

__________ Información de ESET NOD32 Antivirus, versión de la base de firmas de virus 6275 (20110707) __________

ESET NOD32 Antivirus ha comprobado este mensaje.

http://www.eset.com

© 2010 Arts Advocacy BC